Replies to post #6132 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[nodummy]

I don't know. I suppose it is possible that they may lie about the amount of money paid for the promotion in the hopes that more people will buy into the promotion if they think an extraordinary amount of money was paid for it, but I'm not sure that is the case. Seems like a big number like $2.75 million being paid for a promotion would be more likely to draw the attention of the regulators and probably isn't worth the risk.

I know it brought the attention of people like Melissa Davis, David Baines, Timothy Sykes, Carol Redmond, the BCSC, many cyber sleuths, and of course myself.

It's an interesting thought. You could be right, but I'm not sure.

[samsamsamiam]

I've often thought that as well. How many of the promoters were putting in ridiculous amounts in hopes of companies hiring them because they are being paid so much. Perhaps even an attempt at setting the bar high enough for the going rate for the cost of doing business with them.
I believe the IRP program failed here because people didn't want others to know how much they were really making. And some inflated their numbers.

the only one I believe that makes what they say is shakerzzz. He always lists the third party unlike most - even if half of them can't be identified!