Correction to patents in Motorola and Ericy lawsuits
I got back home to some info that I had kept re the Motorola lawsuit. I was wrong in my referenced post to Loop that none of the 11 claims of the 6 patents in the Ericy litigation were used in the Motorola litigation. It turns out that claims 8 and 11 of the '089 patent used in Ericy were a continuation of patent '863 used in Motorola. In addition, the '089 patent was one of the three patents revalidated by the US Patent Office. Also a second patent, the '705 claim 1 was also involved in Motorola. Thus 3 of the 11 claims, and 2 of the 6 patents invoved in the Ericy litigation were also involved in the Motorola lawsuit.
Claim 1 of the '450 patent was revalidated and used in the Ericy lawsuit, but not the Motorola lawsuit. This is a patent that referred to basestations in the plural and probably escaped Judge Sanders axe. The '701 patent was the third revalidated patent, but it was not used in the Ericy lawsuit.
From court documents in the Nokia case, we know that 4 claims escaped Judge Sanders axe. The other three are probably claim 3 of the '420 patent, and claims 1 and 2 of the '194 patent, in addition to claim 1 of the '450 patent. Claims 8 and 11 of the '089, claims 9 and 11 of the '358, claim 1 of the '705, and claims 4 and 7 of the 194 patent were probably the ones that Judge Sanders ruled noninfringement on, due to the single basestation issue.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
