Thanks for pointing this out "agreement in principle"
IMO more evidence that puppet strings might be in play. I'm not claiming my statements are for sure or true, only that I find it odd the PR's are vague and agreement in principle isn't factual either. Maybe this is their way of "providing shares". This also gives them the right to dilute if required in the future. We've all been warned.
"An agreement in principle is an agreement which makes the major terms of an agreement clear, laying the groundwork to make a contract. Agreements in principle are not legally enforceable as a general rule because they are not formal contracts, although sometimes they will be used in legal cases if there is a dispute. For people outside the legal field, agreements in principle can be confusing because they may make it seem as though everything is agreed when this is not actually the case."