Since you are at odds with IDCC Management's Business plan, regarding CONFIDENTIAL TRADE SECRETS..Do you also have an opinion as to why General Dynamics is not listed as a licensee on IDCC's Licensee Web page, and whether you would have done differently if you were in charge of their Business Plan? TIA
P.S. Does LOMP actually hold any Patents in his sole name and not assigned to others? TIA
3) An $8M purchase(?) on patents (our business model) is important and apparently material enough to warrant itemized disclosure.
(4) If management is blowing off a serious question from shareholders with BS about "competitive reasons", then that says something about management, which concerns me. I really don't understand how there could be anything competitive about the source of these patents, unless another purchase is imminent, which could not be the case if the source is now a BK company with no more assets.
(5) If we incurred another $8M expense from a another failed litigation effort, which may be the situation, then that also says something relevant about management, especially if they give us BS to obscure the facts.
(6) Shareholders are probably the one interested parties that do not know the story behind these obviously important patents.
I will go back to the case file and read a bit to see what the "breach of contract" with Lomp was about or even if it involved patents, which it may not.
MO,
Corp_Buyer