InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 75
Posts 19489
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: Corp_Buyer post# 101601

Tuesday, 04/12/2005 11:22:33 AM

Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:22:33 AM

Post# of 432922
Since you are at odds with IDCC Management's Business plan, regarding CONFIDENTIAL TRADE SECRETS..Do you also have an opinion as to why General Dynamics is not listed as a licensee on IDCC's Licensee Web page, and whether you would have done differently if you were in charge of their Business Plan? TIA

P.S. Does LOMP actually hold any Patents in his sole name and not assigned to others? TIA


3) An $8M purchase(?) on patents (our business model) is important and apparently material enough to warrant itemized disclosure.

(4) If management is blowing off a serious question from shareholders with BS about "competitive reasons", then that says something about management, which concerns me. I really don't understand how there could be anything competitive about the source of these patents, unless another purchase is imminent, which could not be the case if the source is now a BK company with no more assets.

(5) If we incurred another $8M expense from a another failed litigation effort, which may be the situation, then that also says something relevant about management, especially if they give us BS to obscure the facts.

(6) Shareholders are probably the one interested parties that do not know the story behind these obviously important patents.

I will go back to the case file and read a bit to see what the "breach of contract" with Lomp was about or even if it involved patents, which it may not.


MO,
Corp_Buyer




mschere

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News