jq1234,
<PGNX at least spent more than 25% total cost on oral trial already. Trial prepration and initiation cost a lot. >
Yes, but 75% is still more than 25% :)
I would definitely prefer a partnership for PRO140. Maybe I am naive, but I still think it could command a decent part of the market as a single drug treatment via a once or twice a month as sub-cutaneous injection. I do understand treating IV drug users as a sub-population, but I am not sure how much cash that will bring in.
I do agree that given the anti-PMSA dug conjugated antibodies for prostate cancer is very interesting. However, that will take quite some time and take a huge chunk of cash, so partners will be needed there, assuming of course the data generated looks good. The nice part about monoclonal Abs to the C. difficile toxin is that trials should move along much more rapidly, and recall that the PGNX mentioned market is a decent size.