News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Webwyrm

02/10/11 11:20 AM

#174195 RE: BULLDOUGHZER #174193

Ill drink to that LOL!
icon url

shinebox

02/10/11 11:20 AM

#174196 RE: BULLDOUGHZER #174193

Yup, that's all we can do now...just guess
icon url

maltlikka

02/10/11 11:22 AM

#174197 RE: BULLDOUGHZER #174193

You ain't kiddin. I feel like I already had a years worth of February!
icon url

rlkline

02/10/11 11:23 AM

#174198 RE: BULLDOUGHZER #174193

Its all your fault!! This is our punishment for you talking about his dog eating his papers before the call. :)
icon url

free_man_n_paris

02/10/11 11:32 AM

#174213 RE: BULLDOUGHZER #174193

Yes, and isn't that kind of sad.
So many possibilities for this company, and promises of transparency, but in the end the company has provided very little, so we're left with nothing but those wild guesses.

I just can't get around the lack of substantive info from Watson.
Why no sub numbers? Cause they're bad? So, tell us anyway. What is he afraid of, hurting the pps? LOL

Just promises followed by problems. And I know many startups can have these problems, but I still don't see the advantage of the factual silence.

This has undoubtedly become a "typical" pink at least until W decides otherwise.
It's all up to him now.

I'm not expecting much anymore out of this investment. May have to write this one off and just chalk it up to experience.