News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BuzzOnDaBeach

04/06/05 7:25 PM

#156806 RE: DAVE_007 #156805

What drugs are they on ...............

Subsequent sale of stock is in the market and only market makers and brokers make money from the transactions. Therefore, CMKX has not made any money on the sale of stock in the market since on or about September 2002.

What a crock that is. OF COURSE companies make money when they sell shares. Are these guys absolute morons and amateurs??? Read the filing for every s8 issued by an OTC. THAT IS THEIR FINANCING, OFTEN TO PAY FAT SALARIES. Issuing shares via S8. The only difference here is, CMKX NEVER ISSUED ANY S8's and sold 700 billion shares into the market.

What, out of the kindness of their hearts the company just gives away 700 BILLION SHARES. LMAO

I guess zoomstocks has never heard of secondary offerings, convertible debentures, debt financing, etc............

MORONS

Buzz
icon url

janice shell

04/06/05 7:26 PM

#156807 RE: DAVE_007 #156805

WHAAAAATTT???

Subsequent sale of stock is in the market and only market makers and brokers make money from the transactions.

That's just crazy.
icon url

Euthydemus

04/06/05 7:30 PM

#156811 RE: DAVE_007 #156805

ROFL! They use these big words that I don't understand...

Looking at the epistemology of CMKM Diamonds...

Translated: Looking at the theory of knowledge of CMKM Diamonds...

Oh, I see, that makes MUCH more sense.

http://www.zoomingstocks.com/main_join.htm




icon url

hasher

04/06/05 7:48 PM

#156822 RE: DAVE_007 #156805

"Are the CMKX Owners making money and doing well?

That is doubtful. The CMKX Management is expending monies for drilling operations, attorneys, the CMKXtreme Machine and other racing ventures."


Zoomingstocks really helps their credibility by treating people like they were idiots..
MY god, how do they have the audacity to shove this at the shareholders who don't have 3.5 million dollar homes or 4 Hummers!!
icon url

TSXminer

04/06/05 8:13 PM

#156844 RE: DAVE_007 #156805

About Zooming$tocks.com: Zooming$tocks.com is your premier market analysis company whose goal is to provide you with rapid and timely information, well suited to your investment needs.

Translation: We put you on our sucker's list.
icon url

Mark_Leh

04/07/05 1:11 AM

#156890 RE: DAVE_007 #156805

"Just one comment - the words naked shorting means nothing to the general public. I see the SEC and Donaldson using the word shorting in front of senators to try to fool them. Let's start calling this what it is "Share counterfeiting." Counterfeiting has a solid ring to it and the public needs to understand it is wrong."

The readers comment puts things in perspective. It is illegal to counterfeit U.S. currency but not illegal to counterfeit stock shares which is representative of "investor money". Basically, it appears that they are walking away with the money and leaving the investor holding a "bogus" piece of electronic paper that says they own stock in a company when they really do not. What is wrong with this picture! Counterfeiting is counterfeiting and stealing is stealing.


I don't really understand this. Maybe you can help me.

When a bank meets its reserve requirement with the Fed and makes loans based on that, it is creating money. The money is subsequently counted by the Federal Reserve when it reports the data on money supply (M1, M2, etc.). We, of course, do not call this money creation "counterfeiting" even though the money is created out of thin air.

When an investor borrows a stock and sells it to someone new, we do not call this counterfeiting. Even though two people now have the beneficial value of that same share of the stock, we all acknowledge that nothing has been counterfeited.

When a someone shorts a stock without a borrow, this is counterfeiting, right? Why?

My understanding is that, when someone counterfeits currency and gives it to someone for payment, that payment is worthless. The recipient has been gypped. But when a naked short-seller sells stock, he's on the hook. Take the current case, where everyone is saying that any day now CMKX will be acquired for .20-.34 a share. All those naked (and covered) short-sellers are on the hook for that money. Everyone agrees about that--isn't that what all the excitement is about?

So I don't get why this is counterfeiting. It seems like the fundamental opposite of counterfeiting; instead of giving something of no value, all these CMKX short-sellers have given something of remarkable value.

Maybe you can illuminate me on what I'm missing here. Thanks in advance.