News Focus
News Focus
icon url

TSXminer

01/31/11 4:25 PM

#324769 RE: DanDerr #324768

Nice metaphor!

What a fetid pant load!

icon url

jimmym4

01/31/11 6:33 PM

#324771 RE: DanDerr #324768

Re: BHOLLENEGG 1/29/11 FWIW
« Reply #93 Today at 12:32pm »

JWB...I checked into the Deli Situation. I would like to put to rest the Deli misinformation you and others keep trying to convince the shareholders.

Deli and his family owned several billion shares. Deli received information that the maximum amount the shareholders would be compensated for is one billion shares. When Deli bought the shares he thought the maximum that would be paid was a few cents per share. When Deli heard the payment would be in dollar amounts pps, he said the payments for a billion shares would provide him and his family more money than they could ever spend in a lifetime. These are the reasons why Deli sold some his family's shares.

What stocks Deli did not sell, he gave away to the ones who were not shareholders and in tragic circumstances, and those who owned very little shares and were also living with tragic circumstances.

Deli selling his shares does not have any influence on when the shareholders are getting paid or how much the shareholders are getting paid. As for the rumors of the lawsuit and those associated with the lawsuit being a part of Deli's selling or getting funds from Deli are totally false and an insult. Who in their right mind would do something like this with 50,000 Shareholders, the DOJ, the FBI, and the SEC watching or monitoring every move?

Thank you,
BHollenegg