A follow up: What do you suggest to remedy the situation of the .039 share price, not being as high as some of us would like? Fair enough? I'm assuming you will say you want the company to pay for an awareness campaign, true? That costs money, which means possible dilution of our stock and essentially we pay for this awareness campaign in the end if that happens. Now does this campaign get the share price higher and we hope no one takes profits on that run up (which we know is going to happen) and we also hope for a tender offer while we are at the top of the spike on our share price?
Just gotta have some patience, this product will speak for itself. Someone made a great post the other day, IF we get a completed prototype and IF it is as efficient as they hope for or claim. Word will get out alright, trust me. You think someone like GE has their head buried in the sand? They buy products and inventions to just shelve them, so it doesn't hurt their bottom line. This product may be different, they want to take it and run with it, who knows. But plenty of big time folks are scouring pennyland to scap up startup companies. Even if that doesn't happen, Dave Myers and his people will be buying and as they spead the word, others will be buying, goes on and on and on. This product will take care of the share price all on its own, we just need a completed and efficient product.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
