Replies to post #324168 on CMKM Diamonds Inc (fka CMKX)

[Iggy_Bot]

yes i was looking for Peter M, our Lawyer Bill F to but an end to this first thing, but nothing

[dia duit]

One would of thought A statement from GI first thing Monday Morning snubbing this once and for all.
Like I said imo you won't hear any statement

Not me! I expected the same thing to happen with the William Majcher situation where Hodges never mentions Majcher's involvement again.

Now if Hodges and Maheu have a private conversation where Maheu request Hodges cease mentioning PM/GI's involvement with this allege settlement deal, and if you never hear or read of Hodges mentioning it again, well......

However if this should persist, then you may see a statement from PM/GI.

[dia duit]

One would of thought A statement from GI first thing Monday

Some have claim they were told Peter Maheu is out of the country at this time.

Apparently the staff at GI did not believe CMKX shareholders plight, or Hodges allegations are a priority. How's that for an insult!


By briwadd

Response from Noel Krieger
« Thread Started Today at 7:00pm »

Re: Fw: CMKX
From: Noel Krieger <[e-mail]>Add to Contacts
To: Brian ****** <***********@att.net>
Cc: [e-mail]


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brian, I have forwarded your email to Peter Maheu. I apologize but I did not see your email dated the 17th. I wonder where the attorney got the information that Global was fined $150 million? Although I would like to respond to your email, I will leave that up to Peter. Best regards, Noel

At 03:41 PM 1/19/2011, you wrote:

Noel Krieger:

I remain confused as to why Global Intelligence refuses to acknowledge or refute the allegations made by Attorney Hodges. When GI did not comment after the lawsuit was filed against the SEC, I concluded that GI did not see it as significant or worth their time to comment. However, now that Attorney Hodges has specifically stated that GI is responsible for the delay in payment distributions, I find myself wondering wherein lies the truth. What is GI's position on this matter (50,000 shareholders would like to know.) Will GI seek a cease and desist order as you have previously stated? Will they ackowledge their role in the sting operation? Do you stand by your previous comment that GI has never had a role in CMKX funds? Why would an attorney (that claims he speaks with government agencies almost daily) state that GI is the delay? If you are not permitted to speak on the issue, could you at least reply with a 'no comment'.

Thanks
Brian *******