because it's a legit co. that will survive this garbage .. that is why
i'm very clear that i add shares as i see execution .. btw .. zealously is an interesting choice of words .. i'm not sure what is missed since i've never *extolled* one person to buy one share and have clearly articulated that all with concerns should always wait for clarity
but i have and do as mgmt executes
to me .. they did so in the spring of 2009 when mgmt converted all their pref'd shares to common meaning they share the pain and gain :)
execution came with the CC in july 2009 re: ETC execution came with ETC's launch in sept 2009 execution came with *survival* post ceo of WW's passing execution came with CIMA's acquisiton execution came with holding 2 annual SMs' (dec 2009/sept 2010) execution came with websites and shareholder updates
is there more that can be done .. you bet'cha .. but as i've posted from the start .. i have never expected a well seasoned mgmt at this level .. it's not the *norm* and since i don't expect seamless .. i'm not disappointed .. it's also why i give on avg 3 to 5 years for a co. to *establish* and *grow*
it's also one of the reasons why my final *determination* aka caveats has to do with the new ceo and his/her *intent*
i know what i'd do based on the knowledge i have *educated* myself on over these past years
it makes the difference whether i stay a sor post expo's first ever content driven run that comes with *transparency* .. :)
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
