Brilliant computations, yet comprehensive and understandable! Now it's Au's turn to do it's thing along with the ailing, global economic situation we're inevitably facing. Textbook algebraic computations with a hint of microeconomics thrown-in for good measure.
Mr. Troger: I think this is my first post to you and will not be my last! After reading all the posts today I just think the STREET just does not know we exist yet.
I commend your on your mathamatical work flow and derivation formulation! I tried to make mine simple and sweet--you showed every step of analysis-awesome you took the time and effort to do so--hope most understood. I left out Ag on purpose and price to earnings ratios most do not understand. Again, excellent expose!
Every time I do the Math I keep getting the same PPS- I change the variable and it changes a bit..but the assumption in CORRECT. We definately analyse the same strategic numbers the same way--that is pretty cool-I think. Like Ficose said-put Au at 2K and add a few strategic presious metals just for flavor and look what you can get. But.....all aside...reality dropped us a tick today.
IMO I think this talk today of buy later this year--spring and fall-at .0005 etc is bunk. One waits on CGFIA for all the dips and they just may never come.
The permit--NOW-is a lock! Waiting another year kinda sucks but so what-look how long many longs have waited now. I am OK with waiting-but during the wait we should be proactive in getting the PPS even up to where it should be now---lets not let it sink to oblivion to get a good buy. It is a great BUY now at current price.
I think it is Guyers responsibility now-and for the next few months to keep this stock price up--whatever it takes--make the 10Q exerpt a PR -maybe hook up with "Super dooper stocks R US" (Joke) to expose and promote the company etc et.al.
At present--with such a +++ 10q I thought we would go thru the roof today-nothing- just a whimper. Does not have to be that way unless we talk ourselves into waiting till spring/fall when the PPS falls to crap--how great!!??
Help me out on the board as to how-when-why and where we can get the momentum going on CGFIA--this is to all who read this too!!! We now need constant PR releases to swing interest into CGFIA--for all the good that is to come. I dont want to start with everyone waiting for 0.0004 to buy. Buy now and lets get it started at .0049-thats a good start and go from there.
I am getting off subject...thanks again for your input to our shareholders / We will all benefit in the long term !
I'm certainly pulling for that range within a year as well. The potential here certainly seems to far outweigh any gloom or doom scenario that are commonplace with so many other stocks. Great job Grizz and Troger.
Troger, now that you mentioned it, I do have some things to add:
1. Do you suppose that Rice and Guyer need reminding of anything? Hmm....not sure about that. Will have to check out their 40 year resumes. Extra specious help is very difficult to come by. 2. Are you aware of any posts by 'creaminguy' where he mentioned anything about CGF pps? If so, could you forward that info to me. I would be very interested in what he had to say. Thanks for your help on that. 3. Since CGFI looks like they'll be in need of some extra-sturdy equipment in the removal of tailings, do you suppose they could use an extra 'J36', or would the one we already have be able to get the job done? Here is a link which we could perhaps forward to Mr. Rice and Mr. Guyer since they apparently have been enlisting the help of 'seasoned Junior Mining Co. experts': http://www.heritage-images.com/Preview/PreviewPage.aspx?id=2367052&pricing=true&licenseType=RM Now, I did some research on these 'behemoths' and they are: 1) Fairly reliable yet versatile. They can even plow snow - good for the winter months. Tough Colorado mining winters require such 'unaffected' brute force. I believe they're also sturdy enough to handle the 'blunt force' of avalanches. So the DRMS will be happy that management has that covered. 2. There aren't many of these remaining, so we need to make a recommendation to CGF management asap that we have one. 3. The only drawback that I see with the J36 'loco'motives is that historically, they require larger boiler upgrades in order tackle hot air pressure from the forward compartment.
Outside of these minor obstacles, I'm thinking a goods locomotive like our J36 could really tackle the daunting task of transporting garbage to-and-from any location.
Let's let the other brain trust members here mull this over.
no - the message has a bunch of tables with calcs assuming diffferent levels of mill produiction and the resulting pps assuming outstanding share levels