I respect that position. However, if a person approaches a third party service provider on the merits for which services were rendered would it not serve beneficial to provide that information if they are in fact being challenged? Though my post: 13090 is succinct it does insinuate that such information, though valid may be true, inflammatory, or worse as seen from another well know scrupulous company recently; defamatory in that their title and position were used to embellish statements which would give “value” to a company as this. Silence is consent or affirmation in some instances but when we’re speaking a HALF BILLION dollars; regardless of additional PR wouldn’t anyone wonder why share price is a mere sub penny? There are a handful of Blue Chip companies with markets less valued which trade at $5+ respectively with a market which is unrealized. Gold is one of the oldest continued currencies and economic stabilizers the world over. Don’t you think the community at large would be jumping at such a PR and not have to wait for additional validation?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
