News Focus
News Focus
icon url

GRDOROCKS

01/11/11 10:29 AM

#168758 RE: Kop #168753

Stupid question........for there not to be a hostile takeover..Watson has to hold 50.1% of the company......so when these shares were put out, would he not have to buy to keep his percentage up???
icon url

hispeedsoul

01/11/11 10:40 AM

#168767 RE: Kop #168753

I actually agree with your assessment. I just wanted your opinion without stating my assessment. If that is in fact the situation...I will bail. I'm staying until hard data proves are assessment to be correct. Watson will lose my trust if that turns out to be the case. I don't like to play follow the carrot.
icon url

hispeedsoul

01/11/11 2:45 PM

#168871 RE: Kop #168753

From Chad Gray:

Hi XXXX,

"The purpose of the buying before the increased shares was to tell the investors that we believe that a .01price was considerably low and we are in it for the long run so we would not be affected by the increased shares.

We are buying at these levels."