Interesting. Just curious. Why do you believe Chris Jensen would show up defending Nikolaj Vissokovsky?
I can understand Turino vehemently defending Vissokovsky in that declaration of his because they are linked closely in the GBDX mess. Turino strongly denies that Vissokovsky was a party in Houser's BTMD/BMCS deals with the boyz.
41. Vissokovsky had no knowledge of Bio tech Medics, Houser’s company. The merger was effective in December 2004 when I only met Vissokovsky a couple of occasions. I never discussed Bio Tech Medics or Keith Houser with Vissokovsky. Vissokovsky had No participation in any stock transaction, no shares issued to him, no receipt of monies of any kind whatsoever for or on behalf of Biotech Medics. Vissokovsky never met Houser. Vissokovsky never contacted Houser he had no reason, he did not know the individual or the company. Vissokovsky did not launder monies at any time for me or anyone else as suggested in the indictment. However, Barnett on the other hand was in major disagreement with Houser legally and on the message boards. If you check the court records for the Barnett/Houser litigation you can confirm this to be true.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
