This weeks rumour out of the west is that the first group in the hot seats under the lights have given up the names for the second group who had connections with CMKX. Now it seems the rumour is that the second group has given up the names of touts and others who have had dirty hands in this whole mess called CMKX. Should this be the case and any of this turns out to be fact then websites like this one could receive a lot of requests for the touts' IP addresses.
Janice .. where does the onus sit ? If I bring new certs to the market my broker is required to know where and how I got them. This is now the norm as far as I know because of the fight against money laundering. Are you trying to tell me that Urban and others who receive S 8 shares can just simply deposit them in a trading account without disclosing how they got them ? I DON'T THINK SO !!!! The onus falls on the broker to accept them. There could be big collusion here too. If undisclosed S 8 shares have been hitting the market by the billions as you are trying to say, that is pretty hard to believe. I thought we had checks and balances in this system. Apparently we do not. Perhaps you are suggesting the brokers are incompetent in their policing. I know my broker polices me as a matter of course the same as he 'polices' all the other clients. No my dear .. this whole system stinks from top to bottom. And the way I read your posts you think it is probably O K for dastards to hit the bid in volume to sell shares that they do not own. To me that is FRAUD with a capital F.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
