News Focus
News Focus
icon url

nathanial

01/03/11 8:21 PM

#122000 RE: sebastian09 #121997

Correct and Ken was trying to look out for the shareholder by not having them incur this cost.
icon url

evcantrade

01/03/11 9:53 PM

#122024 RE: sebastian09 #121997

It is my understanding that if our shares of BVIG were left restricted and the responsibility of unrestriction was left to the shareholder ,then there would have been some monetary expense incurred by shareholders during the process of unrestriction and awarding the shares in the 4 for 1 .
That is how it was explained to me.