oh my goodness, seriously? so you're saying after everything JD has done to his faithful shareholders using *ETC*, it's been without full penetration? WOW, how much more can they take?
The question was 4kids, how can someone claim to DCA shares all the way from .03, to a low of .0001, and still have a profitable investment. It can't possibly happen unless there were cheaper shares available at some point in time. Do you remember my post to you?
What will you do with your .0001 fill when the company reverse splits? Is that a practical way to trade? DCA'ing shares all the way from .03 in hindsight was not very profitable, what makes you think .0001 shares will ever be?
---------------- let's see to keep it simple i'll use one more NV SOS increase b4 X (hypothetical) r/s done ? in 2011
so say NV SOS is 3.5B at the time of say a 3500 for 1 r/s .. and i hold 35M
*caveat* all mgmt holds *common shares* and as such shares the pain and the gain
presume the OS is maxed out to the AS
35M divided by 3500 = 10,000 shares 3.5B divided by 3500 = 1.000.000 shares
my expectation is very simple based on a few facts .. *known* .. ETC exists and was developed and tweaked for X b4 being successfully launched on 9/15/2009 .. it's far easier to access capital as a private entity today (at this level) than a public one .. hence if ETC has a *home* with 100M at full penetration .. i'm presuming it's 25M that needs to be accessed to *fill that home* with ETC
mgmt planned to issue a cash div for ETC sor if they were *able* to spin off as a private entity
my guess is those of us stay with expo and don't sell if taken private post r/s will *garner* a cash div in time .. (and i'm not presuming the week after either)
so presuming ETC hits full penetration with 100M and the co.s SS is now 1M .. folks can do their own calcs as to potential cash divs *generated* by expo holdings
one other reason why i'm so inclined to hang tight imo mgmt fully understands that the *manipulation* of their stock won't change with transparency .. but what won't hurt it .. is to take private and let co. *grow* .. in due course sans manipulation for a few years .. SS *not rigged* and fins audited .. co. can re uplist down the road .. this time to the amex or naz with a *CLEAN* SS .. and due to 1M shares in the OS to be *liquid* .. would most likely do a forward split at a minimum of 1 for 15 .. so my 10,000 shares now become 150,000 shares (OS is now 15.000.000 not 1M)
anyhow .. i just look at what i'd do if i ran things
== i can speculate with the best of them .. but one thing i'm not guessing on is ETC .. mgmt's integrity re: shares sold .. none imo and the co.s ability to survive the BS without a doubt in my mind :)
== now you know why i'll be bid sitting when the next *frenzy* hits and i'll double my shares if EXPH is taken no bid
the *box* works both ways .. imo 11/29 was a bear trap resets have to be done b4 eow .. even if resets are done ETMM TO ETMM .. (nothing new there) .. a few will intercept
but first things first .. here's to transparency in jan 2011
*caveat* all mgmt holds *common shares* and as such shares the pain and the gain
Management claims a lot of thngs without proof.
ETC exists and was developed and tweaked for X b4 being successfully launched on 9/15/2009 ..
I'm not sure *some* understand the meaning of the bolded word in that "statement".
hence if ETC has a *home* with 100M at full penetration .. i'm presuming it's 25M that needs to be accessed to *fill that home* with ETC
I'm sure there is something intelligent in that, but dang, what a day to lose my decoder ring.
is to take private and let co. *grow* .. in due course sans manipulation for a few years .. SS *not rigged* and fins audited .. co. can re uplist down the road .. this time to the amex or naz with a *CLEAN* SS .
How does one *uplist* from a private entity? Don't you mean they have to file for a public offering and apply for listing?