News Focus
News Focus
icon url

purplemountain

12/29/10 3:17 PM

#83286 RE: mbartoszek #83285

I understand he is a nuisance.

It seems that threatending to sue an intervenor in a case where you have interest would - at minimum - raise eyebrows, and perhaps stall that case while the issue was worked out.

I understand that you are not threatening such -- others on this board are suggesting it. I just know that would be a move of absolute stupidity, and as such you consider it only in the most extreme circumstances.
icon url

spencerforhire

12/29/10 3:23 PM

#83290 RE: mbartoszek #83285

Interesting comment and thanks for the compliment in sentence one as I've tried very hard to protect myself along the way just as you have. I simply have done so without thinking about receivership. If sentence two is accurate then the state of NH believes your PPA is fair to the rate payer (which their experts specifically say to date they do not) and the state considers all the IPPS that have proven track records, nuisances, which the state is currently stating that is a concern the expert's haven't looked at quite yet. Since these same arguments are my arguments, your logic is missing, and as you say, you're too busy for your investors now and need to get back to work?
icon url

king oil

12/29/10 3:57 PM

#83306 RE: mbartoszek #83285

I agree, which is also why he lost his election bid. Apparently the majority of the Berlin community wants nothing to do with him either.