Predictable, after the stock has been on a tear. I am sure there will be others as well.
Badger-
Exactly which facts are you concerned about?
Nothing would piss me off more after spending a tremendous amount of time to research a stock, sharing my conclusions despite having no obligations to do so, then having somebody that provides little value to the discussion make a blanket request to provide detailed footnote documentation to all of my facts.
Nuke did not ask to have his posts listed as stickies at the top of the board - the rest of the board participants did. Many of these participants have sufficient knowledge to make that judgement.
Nuke is not issuing a research report and you are not paying for anything. His 95% estimate of success at the CAFC obviously just an estimate based on his substantial research that he has already gone to great lengths to document.
Nuke doesn't need to completely document his facts to your satisfaction. You owe him the courtesy of performnng a little due diligence yourself and reading his posts before asking silly, non-specific questions. If you have a legitimate disagreement with one or more of NukeJohn's facts, please be specific, otherwise your request is terribly insulting, demeaning, and displays your ignorance.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
