News Focus
News Focus
icon url

sevendoubler

12/18/10 12:27 AM

#20744 RE: stervc #20734

stevc> solid evaluation...imo
icon url

thecrusher2011

12/18/10 12:37 AM

#20745 RE: stervc #20734

One has to consider his discalimer as well in the NI 43-101 which states " In particular, David Brown & Associates did not attempt to determine the veracity of geochemical, geophysical, or geological data reported by third parties, or to conduct duplicate sampling for comparison with the geochemical results provided by other parties."

Third party information comes in large part from Rauno Perttu (who is mentioned 12 times in the NI 43-101) one of the insiders at Dutch Gold and when you pair the first statement with this one:

"Cable Mountain Mine Inc., who discovered the Basin Gulch deposit in 1987, explored the lode source of the placer gold from the late 1980s until 1997. To date, 323 reverse circulation and core holes have been drilled on the property for a total of 89,800 feet, with holes ranging from 80 feet to 1,045 feet in depth. In addition, 40 test trenches with a total length of 17,000 feet have been excavated and sampled. Cable Mountain Mine, Inc., Chevron Resources, and Cyprus Exploration have performed the work at various stages in the project. All of this work was supervised or reviewed by Dutch Gold Resources President, Rauno Perttu, which provides a continuity of the work performed."

There seems to be a conflict, also it seems David Brown was EMPLOYED by Dutch Gold in 2008 at the Benton mine before this NI 43-101 was performed as seen here in this article http://archive.dailytidings.com/2008/0517/stories/0517_bp_sou.php

Couple all of this with the fact that Mr. Brown lists no business address, that google searches yield no results of him performing an Ni 43-101 except for Dutch Gold, the fact that he uses a p.o. box, the fact that his website has been under construction for a couple of weeks that I am aware of (perhaps longer) http://www.dbrown-assoc.com/ , that website on a "whois" search shows that the identity of the person who registered it is BLOCKED which is bizzare because the buisness he operates David Brown & Associates has his very name right in it. Several posters have said that he did not renew his Oregon license this year, but he performed an ni 43-101 in 2007 and his Oregon geologists seal does not appear http://www.secinfo.com/d12Pk6.uY38.d.htm yet he did use one for his more recent ni 43-101 for Basin Gulch http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/928375/000114036110003224/ex99_1.htm
Here are the guidelines in regard to this Execution of Technical Report - A technical report must be dated, signed and, if the qualified person has a seal,
sealed by
(a) each qualified person who is responsible for preparing or supervising the preparation of all or part of
the report; or
(b) a person or company whose principal business is providing engineering or geoscientific services if
each qualified person responsible for preparing or supervising the preparation of all or part of the
report is an employee, officer or director of that person or company. http://www.cim.org/committees/NI_43-101_Dec_30.pdf

Adding all of this up leaves some room for doubt in my opinion.
icon url

bundyelvis

12/18/10 5:55 AM

#20749 RE: stervc #20734

With all that gold waiting to dig up, I am just wondering why were only at 2 cents a share. We were higher last week with no PR?
icon url

DRCAL

12/18/10 7:46 AM

#20750 RE: stervc #20734

You are pretty good at your analysis. My stepfather was a world famous geologist. He would have agreed with you. He probably would have inferred resouces of 2X for the other two-thirds.
I believe that we are looking at one of the largest open pit and low grade gold mining operations in the world. When gold was $600 per ounce it wouldn't have been ptofitable to mine. With gold at nearly $1,400 per oz and possibly going up, this represenrs a bonanza mine.
icon url

Trooperstocks

12/18/10 9:25 AM

#20765 RE: stervc #20734

STERVC DONT YOU THINK, BY COMPARISON

OF THE (2) NI-4301 REPORTS THAT YOU CAN FIND MANY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THEM, ESPECIALLY THINGS NOT IN SAE* REPORT

DGRI NI-4301=
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=7015848

SAEI NI-4301= http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1443105/000114420410065486/v205036_ex99-0.htm

LETS POINT OUT JUST A FEW OF THE MANY MANY DIFERENCES TO SHOW HOW THOROUGH AND CREDIBLY REAL DUTCH GOLD'S NI-4301 REALLY IS


1) NO WHERE IN SAE* NI-4301 REPORT IS THEIR THE SEAL FROM THE GEOLOGIST

2) THE TABLE OF CONTENTS IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE

30 OF COURSE THEIRS WAS A BAD CON ARTIST RENDITION OF A REAL N1-4301 LIKE DUTCH GOLDS SHOWN IN THE SEC FILED 8-K'S

3) THERE ARE NONE = NOT EVEN ONE DRAWING, CHART, MEANWHILE DGRI HAS A WHOLE SUB SECTION DEVOTED TO THEM, THAT GO INDEPTH, AND THOROUGHLY SHOWS GOLD CONCENTRATIONS THROUGH THESE SEISMIC CHARTS AND GRAPHS

FIGURES
TITLE PAGE
Figure 1: Project Location 1
Figure 2: Claims Location Map 9
Figure 3: Aerial Photograph (Date Unknown) 11
Figure 4: Drill Hole Locations 14
Figure 5: Soil Geochemistry 16
Figure 6: Block A and Block B 18
Figure 7: Representative CSAMT Section Through the BG Diatreme 19
Figure 8: Diatreme Cross-Section 27
Figure 9: Geologic Map 30
Figure 10: Summary of Au Recovery Vs Time for Column Leach Test 44
Figure 11: Plot of Time Vs Au Recovery 70- to 75-foot Interval of Drill Hole 94-70rc 45
Figure 12: GEMCOM and DBA Polygon Locations 49



TABLES


Table 1: KCA Head Assay Results 41
Table 2: KCA Summary of Cyanide Bottle Roll Test 42
Table 3: KCA Metal Recoveries 43
Table 4: Ore Volumes From Drilling Results, Block A 47
Table 5: Ore Volumes From Drilling Results, Block B 48
Table 6: GEMCOM Computer Modeling Results 50


http://www.data.scec.org/glossary.html

http://geology.com/minerals/gold.shtml

http://www.geosociety.org/

http://www.geologistsassociation.org.uk/

******WHY A REAL NI-4302 IS SO IMPORTANT BY A CERTIFIED AND REPUTABLE GEOLOGIST, THAT ONE CAN CONFIRM= http://geology.about.com/cs/mineralogy/a/aa042097.htm


COULD GO ON FOR DAYS...

GO DGRI

YELLOWDOG1 SAYS IT BEST

"WE ARE GOLDEN'


*******************************************************
icon url

amigo777

12/19/10 10:51 AM

#20968 RE: stervc #20734

Also, David Brown Elliot (License #670) is easily verifiable with the State of Washington.

https://fortress.wa.gov/dol/dolprod/bpdLicenseQuery/lqsLicenseDetail.aspx?RefID=380766

The official seal of the David E. Brown with his license number (670) can be found in DGRI's NI 43-101 document.