News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Rawnoc

11/21/10 12:25 PM

#77920 RE: PaperProphet #77919

Now you're just claiming materially false things. Let's review...

(1) You cherry picked a single one out of 17 random examples that I found fast that's 8% contaminated, but ignored that JBII can process it. You further ignored what it may be contaminated with. Other plastics? The more the merrier.

(2) The oil "soaked" one says the buckets the plastic come in were once USED for oil ORIGINALLY -- soaked? You made that up. So, yes, I'm trusting of Mr. Bordynuik and even more so I'm trusting of my DD. I don't need to scan a list of 17 examples then claim a single one that says buckets OF hydrocarbon-only plastic are in used buckets that were once used for OIL. That example was for FREE plastic by the way. See how even the slightest contaminates make an entire load of HDPE plastic worthless to others but JBII can make fuel out of it.

(3) You ignored the 28 examples even though all 30 completely flushed your toilet.
icon url

terryels

11/21/10 12:34 PM

#77924 RE: PaperProphet #77919

people are smart enough to figure out how much a barrel would cost at 300 lbs/barrel (or about 330 lbs of feedstock to make a 300 lb barrel of pryolysis oil if the process is 90% efficient).

The JBI process is not pyrolysis. I have reviewed it to the extent I can with information available and it operates at a much lower temperature, no vacuum or pressure, and can be operated in a semi-oxygen environment.

The products from the JBI processor appear to be the same any refinery would produce.

The plastic cost debate on this board is foolish. Plastic is widely available for free and more than 90% of it ends up in landfill. It's fair to assume JBI is not paying for any plastic.