Can you shed some light on how Rosen was distorting the facts? It is a wonder that he still prevails in the case as at times he appears "beyond his pay grade." thanks.
Yes, he did. I commented on that a couple days ago. It's one thing to say something in court, in the heat of the moment. It's another to do it in writing. Regardless, in the hearings I've listened to, it's obvious that the two of them can't stand each other.