News Focus
News Focus
icon url

xZx

11/15/10 12:00 AM

#36891 RE: daleb2130 #36890

absolutely right. the very fact that they've mentioned bonanza hills, at all, suggests their intentions are to drill in areas beyond the purchased claims. that's easy logic. a slam dunk.

now the question becomes "when", and perhaps even "if", HDI will get that chance. the ball is in briscoe's court imo.
icon url

StrengthenNumbers

11/15/10 12:01 AM

#36892 RE: daleb2130 #36890

A logical outcome...



...given that Briscoe has repeatedly sought JV partners to prove claims. You can bet that NAK and affiliated parties understand the push to evaluate these claims before too many others have time to formulate an attractive competing offer.

I don't know how far we can go, but I'm pretty sure our days in the single digits are numbered.

I smell a sweet deal cookin'...
icon url

ValuePro

11/15/10 10:07 AM

#36911 RE: daleb2130 #36890

...but the purchased lands are and remain part of the Big Chunk claims. The papers had to cite Big Chuck, so you can not infer that the citations are for anything other than the lands purchased.