blackhawks... you need to stop replacing my words, "most," with your words, "all," in order to try and justify your assertions. I would think you might be able to make an argument based on what is said without first changing what is said.....you know, like the writer of the article did by all of a sudden omitting references to Ike.
While I may have been "ill" the day that syllogism was covered in class, I was at least in attendance and understand such. You, on the other hand, appear to not even have been in school the day (today) that this class happened regarding the topic's thread. It was first presented to the board as an "article" AND NOT AS SOMEONE'S OPINION. I'm not addressing the author of the "article," but the original poster with the link and the subsequent questions from other posters. I have no problem with anyone's opinion, as they're entitled to such, but was clearly stating it's nothing more than that and it could possibly be a GOIG related party posting it, and not some article posted by some objective reviewer/journalist etc.
And while your keen to address several points in the post, you're quite remiss about addressing the glaring "change" in the "article" itself...changes that removed the criticism etc and commendation of Ike. Others on the board questioned the parts about Ike and then all of a sudden they go "poof." Well, like I said, that would lead many to believe the a GOIG related party posted it.
"Enthusiastic investor?" I'm happy for him if he is. Most of us were once quite enthusiastic about GOIG....once. We give our company suggestions (you give it yours, I give it Vanity Keywords). Not so much any longer. One can only hope GOIG gets its act together, soon.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
