I have already suggested under a 10% chance of Teva prevailing. I have also argued the philosophical basis for such a ruling.
Being quantitative about each of the four avenues to a legal victory, even if your numbers are wild guesses, imposes a degree of mental discipline you simply can’t achieve with qualitative musings. Until you can put some rough numbers on the table for discussion as I did, I can’t take your pronouncements on this matter seriously.
Most of the time judges decide who they want to win and then look for the rationale that is most likely to survive appeal
Zip- Watch out, your realistic cynicism is showing! What would Sonia say? :-)
"Judges can't rely on what's in their heart. They don't determine the law. Congress makes the law. The job of a judge is to apply the law." -Sonia Sotomayor