Anyone ever consider the fact that competitors of hfbg may be responsible for these types of incidents?
could just be some over zealous {insert favorite big bev company name here] holder for instance,
or the more sinister: said company pays idiots to do such mayhem...
HFBG has to combat this type of attack by asking the council to warn rude/demanding callers that they are not representing the company they supposedly care so much about in a professional manner and they continue to harass they will be referred to law enforcement.
If they were being harassed by someone that just didn't like the councilman, they'd call the cops in heartbeat...why would they put up with it from a shareholder of a company they might be interested in helping, and then punish the company?
HFBG needs to tell all their partners, "DO NOT GIVE OUR SHAREHOLDERS or SUPPOSED SHAREHOLDERS THE TIME OF DAY. PERIOD", "DO NOT HESITATE TO REPORT THEM TO AUTHORITIES FOR HARASSING PHONE CALLS IF THEY KEEP CALLING"
The only info i need as an investor should come from the company, IR, seeing ads in media, product in stores every where i go, or most importantly the Financial Statements...
imo,
cents