The most important statement to come from Nok during the court and arbitration proceedings was that they never intended to pay Idcc anything. This, to my way of looking at it, is an open admission that they entered the licensing contract with Idcc as a sham to throw a fraudulant bone to Idcc. In the contract, there are descriptions of ways for the royalty rate to be determined. If Nok had told the truth at that time; i.e. that they had no intention of ever having to pay, I'm sure that Idcc would have declined to sign such a sham contract. This bad faith should be a critical factor in the deliberations of a court or arbitration panel in reaching a decision in the Idcc-Nok dispute IMO
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
