News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Bull_Dolphin

10/23/10 6:21 PM

#15407 RE: jarta #15406

Thank You. Crystal clear.

regards
icon url

mrfence

10/23/10 11:16 PM

#15408 RE: jarta #15406

Ahhhhh, I didn't get that part... 2. A motion to seal the proceedings concerning the motion to disqualify Amador as counsel.

So what of the 30 some other things does Motion #2 reference to be sealed? Sounds like all the recorded proceedings where Matt is specifically concerned? ... or are those just the ones regarding Amador? I suppose I'm wondering if the proceeding where Matt plead guilty will be sealed because if that is sealed and never opened it kind of implies there may not be sentencing, at least there would have to be another trial or possibly none at all. Why put a guy on trial that isn't arguing with the prosecution?

LOL, the fat lady sings fogeeeeeeetabouti,i,i,i,i,i,iiiiit :-D