News Focus
News Focus
Followers 306
Posts 23748
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/24/2006

Re: jarta post# 15406

Saturday, 10/23/2010 11:16:03 PM

Saturday, October 23, 2010 11:16:03 PM

Post# of 16741
Ahhhhh, I didn't get that part... 2. A motion to seal the proceedings concerning the motion to disqualify Amador as counsel.

So what of the 30 some other things does Motion #2 reference to be sealed? Sounds like all the recorded proceedings where Matt is specifically concerned? ... or are those just the ones regarding Amador? I suppose I'm wondering if the proceeding where Matt plead guilty will be sealed because if that is sealed and never opened it kind of implies there may not be sentencing, at least there would have to be another trial or possibly none at all. Why put a guy on trial that isn't arguing with the prosecution?

LOL, the fat lady sings fogeeeeeeetabouti,i,i,i,i,i,iiiiit big smile


Sail Bay

Come on in... The Waters Fine! :)

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today