InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

HattieTheWitch

10/19/10 2:25 PM

#106599 RE: DFRAI #106578

And you stake your reputation on it...


Did I miss the part where Dew did so?
icon url

DewDiligence

10/20/10 2:33 AM

#106686 RE: DFRAI #106578

MNTA/TEVA—with regards to the 3rd party doing the [Lovenox] manufacturing for TEVA - i presume that you are beholden to your promise to a certain person and this info is not in the public domain?

First, let me reiterate that we’re talking about not just the identity of Teva’s manufacturer, but rather the identity of the company* who developed Teva’s version of Lovenox. This consequential distinction may have been lost on some readers of this board.

I did promise not to reveal the identity of Teva’s Lovenox developer while it is not yet in the public domain, but I think those days are numbered. With what’s been said on this board and a few educated guesses, the answer ought to be within reach of someone with a modicum of sleuthing ability.

*It’s a company, not a research institute like Weizmann. Sorry, jbog.
icon url

DewDiligence

10/20/10 2:45 AM

#106688 RE: DFRAI #106578

Any vibes on the [Copaxone] Markman ruling?

I don’t know anything about the outcome of the Markman hearing beyond what’s already been posted on this board.