Replies to post #37427 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[downsideup]

I'd say that they had already become "a common interest" well prior to the execution of "the fraudulent 2009 agreement"... but that, certainly following it, Williamson was not acting as Daic's attorney with any right to claim a client privilege existed, but as his business partner, and in his own parallel interest, while using what he knew was an fraudulently obtained non-controlling interest, that they had intended to convert into a controlling interest through the operation of yet another set of far flung and all encompassing serial frauds... that included, in particular, the attorney knowingly assisting in the filing of fraudulent papers with the court as a part of the effort made to claim that ownership "right" following the "fraudulent 2009 agreement".

[downsideup]

Agree re the playing field... and, then with success in any CLYW effort intended to re-open the prior case... that will have the pernicious (to them) effect of making the point again in spades that Williamsons' compensation by participation in ownership interest in the intended target of the the frauds, was itself both a result of an agreement to conduct fraud, an induction into participation in fraud, with the payment an already known product of past fraud, that required cooperation in continuing efforts in fraud to sustain its "value" to Williamson.

(a) A lawyer shall not enter into an arrangement for, charge, or collect an illegal fee...

I think signing on to "take part of the loot" in payment is likely to prove to be another violation of the Texas Rules...