Agree re the playing field... and, then with success in any CLYW effort intended to re-open the prior case... that will have the pernicious (to them) effect of making the point again in spades that Williamsons' compensation by participation in ownership interest in the intended target of the the frauds, was itself both a result of an agreement to conduct fraud, an induction into participation in fraud, with the payment an already known product of past fraud, that required cooperation in continuing efforts in fraud to sustain its "value" to Williamson.
(a) A lawyer shall not enter into an arrangement for, charge, or collect an illegal fee...
I think signing on to "take part of the loot" in payment is likely to prove to be another violation of the Texas Rules...