News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Green Money 00

10/11/10 6:11 PM

#72528 RE: BeerIsGood #72524

i agree more info is needed to make an accurate conclusion. if the case was solid the he would have not asked for a jury. which is why in many cases if the lawsuit has holes in it they try and play on a jurys feeling.
icon url

the big guy

10/12/10 1:35 AM

#72552 RE: BeerIsGood #72524

the plaintiff was given a 60-day "Termination Without Cause" Letter. So, the defendant has stated that it was without cause and cannot question the plaintiff's performance. As soon as that argumrent started in a courtroom, the Plaintiff's lawyer would object immediately and would be totally in the right to do so.

Additionally, the plaintiff states that no warnings, etc were given...

The reasons for Termination do not matter. It has been acknowledged that there are none.

That, in essence, is the Breach of Contract argument. We would have to actually be able to see the employment contract to know more, but the law assumes that people act in good faith. In other words is the plaintiff was performing his duties to the best of his ability, the contract is breached. Employment contract is likely boilerplate...