Replies to post #191453 on Green Energy Enterprises Inc. (GYOG)

[artfink]

Thanks. That sure was blunt and to the point.

[Stockfire409]

WOW! In your face Dean!

[SJOGRINGO]

I thought that may be the case...

Marty, happy to have you " in there" and seeing this company survive and prosper....

AS A GOING CONCERN...thanks

Peace

SJOGRINGO

[patriotcat2002]

Give em hell ,Zell!

[pasha_one]

this explains a lot.
thanks Marty!

[masscommuter]

Way to go, Marty ! !
No moss growing on Verity :-)
Thanks for fighting the good fight.

The dispute we had was settled . . August 25, 2009 . . . additionally, “the matter was resolved satisfactorily”.

There Dean, I just saved Quasar $1,400 expense.

For everyone’s information, Verity IS Marty Zell

[spencyg]

And it is necessary to once again aire this in a public forum because...???

I don't get any of this. Posting quotes from a document that says you won't publically discuss some deal from last year?

And why address "baseless rumors" with a preemptive statement?

What the hell is going on here?

[Stockfire409]

I can hear Dean now..."Dammit!!! Now what do I PR?"

LOLOL!!!! This is getting soooooo far into the twilight zone...

[Infinitygold]

The dispute we had was settled by written Agreement dated August 25, 2009 with an Addendum dated August 24, 2009. A portion of that agreement states: “the parties covenant and agree that the terms, conditions and existence of this Agreement are confidential, and that neither they or their attorneys or agents will voluntarily disclose, either orally or in writing, directly or indirectly, the nature of their dispute with anyone” additionally, “the matter was resolved satisfactorily”.

Very interesting indeed!!!

[copper7]

WOW!!! Ok now please tell us what we can expect from the new management. Does APEX have enough cash now to keep this from going south and are they willing to drop this crazy tigerfish and CET thing and get back to buying profitable companies.

[Sparce]

Kudos to that.

[LJ Silver]

Thats not what I was hoping for in a PR or CC from QASP. I hope that the mud slinging stops and we can get the funding done. That is what Dean needs to be working on, not messing with Marty or anyone else.
Marty thank you for standing up and holding him accountable. I am guessing that it is your opinion that we can not get funding with Dean or not?
LJ

[patriotcat2002]

Dean, please respond to this post.

[Revenger]

lol, absolutely hilarious... A person who many on this board hang on every word he says is a former employee that is upset... 2 + 2

[Pennydog]

Thanks for the posting.

[investbernie]

Verity,

Solid post and furthermore, any talk coming from Mr. Bradley besides how this mess is being fixed, "is completely useless".

The market will see it for what it is, "finger pointing", and once again, "blaming others" for his failures as captain of this ship.

(Hot Air. Actually stale air...)

He needs to knock off the arrogance and do what he is suppose to do. Be truthful, be honest, work hard, and do what is right for the greater good, of all individuals involved.

To date he has failed in this regard, but I will admit one major postive I still view is that, he hasn't screwed with raising the AS or doing a RS.

Best Regards, Bernie

[boatman]

It looks like the stick this guy is holding on dean is a tooth pick. Having to come on ihub talking to dean proves this. If it were strong dean would have left by now.

[Buddhasib]

Verity, your efforts are appreciated. I hope you, the team or somebody can talk sense into Dean in order that the best decisions are made on behalf of the shareholders and company. I am at the mercy of the winds, but I hope they are managed in one way or the other to turn this around. Please keep up the good fight on our behalf, in hopefully the best manner possible for all.

[Mile0]

"I just learned of a rumor going around that Dean will PR today that he wants to hold a CC tomorrow, and disclose the issues relating to the reason I left Quasar late year."

It sounds as if Dean intends to stay and not accept your offer to step down.

Is that correct?

TIA

[spongeni]

my question to Marty is; do you know how the new funding source going? Progress?

[Achillez]

Marty,

Looking at some of your previous comments concerning Dean (pasted below) I am wondering what your thoughts would be now? Would you still post any of those glowing statements about the company or Dean Bradley?

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=44410123&txt2find=marty|zell

[tommy2117]

So why don't you come clean and tell us all the reason you left? Any chance you are not living up to your end of the agreement about your departure??

I'm sure as a representative for all of us shareholders, you'd want to have full disclosure about your past dealings with Quasar, right? Is there something hidden in your closet????

[investbernie]

Verity,

Ironic maybe? August 24th 2009 / August 24th 2010?

Best Regards, Bernie

[SPORTSPROPHET]

RE HE HE HE HE HEELEE?

Well Mr. Zell, you saw the writing on the wall long ago.

Personally, I more than doubled my money on QASP before running to the hills.

Unfortunately many others were crushed while you withheld this from them...many very good people that may not trust the Co. even after Dean leaves (either in his own car or a police car) including me.

Maybe there is hope that new shareholders will have their shot of either making a ton on this thing or get crushed like most did.

Maybe some knew you were Verity, IMO most didn't.

Do us a favor...when Dean leaves in a police car, You Tube it for us or we won't believe it.

Good Luck, Marty
SPORTSPROPHET

[El Chingon]

is this INFORMATION RELEVANT to QASP shareholders?

r shareholders going to see the qasp pps head north as a RESULT of u posting A RUMOR?

FLOl.

[guy-robert]

Rumors usually tend be false and are ment to mis-lead people!

imo

[Jim01]

NOTE: Bolded text is MINE.

RUMOR...Dean wants to "out me"

I just learned of a rumor going around that Dean will PR today that he wants to hold a CC tomorrow, and disclose the issues relating to the reason I left Quasar late(last?) year.

The only thing anyone needs to know about the subject is:
(Oh, oh...revealing only a PART of the disputed 'evidence' of wrongdoing is NOT going to enhance my opinion of its scope or veracity.) The dispute we had (which is explained in detail WHERE?) was settled by written Agreement dated August 25, 2009 with an Addendum dated August 24, 2009. A portion of that agreement states: “the parties covenant and agree that the terms, conditions and existence of this Agreement are confidential, and that neither they or their attorneys or agents will voluntarily disclose, either orally or in writing, directly or indirectly, the nature of their dispute with anyone” additionally, “the matter was resolved satisfactorily”.(That's excellent...I'm delighted everything turned out well!) The agreement was signed by Quasar, Dean, Jamie Herring, Bert Watson Lisa Betros and myself.(OK)

So, the agreement and its addendum put to rest disputes important to the parties involved, last year. Right.

However, without knowing precisely WHAT the the details of the disputes were all about... and precisely what the terms of resolvement were, I HAVE NO CLUE regarding the importance of the agreement to the entity known as Quasar International Holdings, Inc. (QASP) or its Principles. Or, for that matter, what would be the consequences to QASP and/or its Principles of a violation of that agreement and addendum. Could a violation be serious enough to be used as leverage to oust the Corporate CEO?

In other words, I don't know enough about the issues being bandied about to offer an informed opinion re: how the 'alleged dilemma' should be resolved.

There Dean, I just saved Quasar $1,400 expense.

For everyone’s information, Verity IS Marty Zell

At this moment in time the only things I’m interested in is the survival of the Company. Seeing to it that Quasar is run ethically by people who are as vitally concerned as I am their investment is finally in sound management hands, who will tell the truth, and that the Shareholders finally get what they invested in, a great ROI. Nice speech. I would hope all the officers (& former officers), members of management and the BOD feel the same way.

Now it’s up to you DEAN!
Do the Right Thing for the Company and Shareholders, and LEAVE.
Marty

As I understand it, Dean has stated he plans on taking a back-seat role of searching out possible acquisition canditates for the Corporation after funding is secured and MS and a few other acquisitions are closed, thereby leaving the day-to-day control of the Corporation to others.

Sorry, Marty...I'm not yet convinced, especially by the 'evidence' you provided above, that demanding the immediate resignation of Dean is justified.

I do believe that Dean has not handled many of his duties and fiduciary responsibilities well at all.

And... the issue of Dean's preferred shares must be resolved. Probably before any financing can be secured.

I am counting on Dean, The Team and whomever else is providing input to resolve the 'problems' that exist to leave their egos in their respective bedrooms and do THE RIGHT THINGS to get our Corporation up & running. As soon as possible!

NOTE: Bolded text is MINE.

Jim

.

[beach_trades]

"All of you should get a life. The truth is: if you don't believe, stop wasting our time and get lost, most of us don't care what you think. "

My favorite Marty Zell post

[beach_trades]

How are all these inside posters not in trouble?

[ddabetsmallwinbig]

I believe Dean already turned the helm over to a new staff to complete the deals. He did seem a bit bodacious and forward. In my dealings with this level of business unless you can buy out everyone in the room proper etiquette and business protocol are in order. Saying you got it and owning the room are two very different things. I believe Dean has some new people in place and has put a new face on the project. Let’s hope things pan out as they should and let some fresh air into the room.
DDABET

[Infinitygold]

Verity, now its very clear that Dean and you had differences in past and it was settled without the knowledge of shareholders.

I have always stated in my post here that although Dean might be wrong in what he did and is doing but the path you and Jr have taken to expose Dean was wrong.

This is public board and all these posts are viewed by so many people and you don't even know how many people might have reported this to higher authorities.

If you guys were able to settle the dispute earlier behind close doors, then how come it couldn't happen this time around?

You posted here that you will post e-mails and attachments to prove to shareholders that Dean did things wrong. Today when Dean wanted to release some information about you (rumors), you grabbed him by neck by posting this:

The dispute we had was settled by written Agreement dated August 25, 2009 with an Addendum dated August 24, 2009. A portion of that agreement states: “the parties covenant and agree that the terms, conditions and existence of this Agreement are confidential, and that neither they or their attorneys or agents will voluntarily disclose, either orally or in writing, directly or indirectly, the nature of their dispute with anyone” additionally, “the matter was resolved satisfactorily”. The agreement was signed by Quasar, Dean, Jamie Herring, Bert Watson Lisa Betros and myself.

Now its time that shareholders need to hear more information from you:

1. You want Dean to be gone completely. Can you please elaborate as to what will happen to deals with Mineseeker, Tigerfish and other targeted companies since they were negotiated by Dean.

2. Once Dean is gone, you stated that "Team" will move forward with original plan. We even don't who the "Team" consists of? Can please tell us who will be on the "Team"?

3. What was role did Lisa played with QASP until last month?

4. What was the previous dispute about?

5. Dean stated in CC that he has invested about $8 milion dollars in QASP. What are your comments on that?

6 When did you realize that Dean needs to go?

Thanks,
Tufan

[mazzulla]

thank you we need every dollar

[MarketGeometry]

Shareholders don't know who to trust. Insiders and Dean has refused to disclose his status of restricted shares. Can you please also disclose your QASP holdings. How many shares you own and if you have sold any shares or not.

[Sputnik]

Everyone knows I am not a fan of Dean Bradley by any stretch of the imagination. That being said, he has shown he will not be intimidated by idle threats. QASP will never get financing for Mineseeker.

Now it’s up to you DEAN!
Do the Right Thing for the Company and Shareholders, and LEAVE.
Marty

[hardwrknliver]

Marty has worked his but off for the stockholders. Lisa has to and many more. Dean please, its for the best. I need something positive, I am just like we all are looking for. Please retire!!! Make the cuts, do whatever, but don't break all the stockholders.. Thanks SW

[patriotcat2002]

It's back. This post came and went several times this morning. I guess it passed the TOS test.

[globalworker]

How does an addendum (8/24; def: something added; an addition) come before an agreement (8/25)?

“the parties covenant and agree that the terms, conditions and existence of this Agreement are confidential

It sure looks like you voluntarily disclosed a confidential matter, which you agreed not to do.

[Pennyless]

Verity,

One of the orignial EQUR stuckholders here that voted with you originally. Is this turning into a rerun of what we got out of lastime?

[xxxx]

I love reading this stuff, it's SO EXCITING, you both have done wonders with the company. Can't wait to see what's in store for us tommorrow.


http://www.freehotpennystocks.com/newsletters/769-qasp-let-s-talk-about-quasar-s-stock-repurchase-program-mentioned-in-a-release-just-days-ago/