Replies to post #82979 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[99leadballoons]

that was FLAT OUT
FALSE INFO

Luckily most folks believe the SEC instead of JD.

Proof supersedes conjecture and fiction. Oh that's right, the SEC is in on it, lol.

also the 10% applies to O/S not A/S. You post that you speak to the SEC on an almost daily basis, surely you knew that already.

And the disclosure statement you are referring to was from 1/30/2007. 2008,2009, and 2010 are, and always will be, after 2007. I guess if we can just trust that form from 2007 then they surely did more than 1.6 million in revenues, have never engaged any stock promoters, had a positive net income over 200k, the O/s is still only 500 million, they still own the building, and JD is the CEO.

Or perhaps you need to bring a little more current info to the table.

Enjoy your day, happy to have helped educate.

[Jeremiah]

That's your analysis. My observations from watching stock movement over the last few months is a somewhat *short*er version. Long shareholders are learning how its done... sell off the stock and then buy it back a greater share quantity at a much lower pps.

Some call that capitulation by weak kneed shareholders. Imo my coined term of *capturelation* fits a little better. I'm more diligent since I took it in the *shorts* on previous occasions.

Shareholders beware of all.... and I do mean all.

Spell'n edit

[Santa Barbara Broker]

Yeah, there IS a problem if the EXPH share data you have had described to you is genuine and you have presented it factually. BUT, there are no plots. No intricate, clandestine circumventions of government agencies. No NSS or FTD involved MMs hanging out in the weeds obsessing over their carefully laid plans to overthrow a rural NC cabinet company making doghouses out of sawdust. There is no reason to elevate something so painfully simple it HURTS MY HAIR just contemplating it to the level of an Ian Fleming Bond novel to have it make sense. Someone or many someones is/are lying about having retained their Expo Holding shares and have sold all or part of their positions. We have concrete evidence of a proven liar that is associated with Expo. I'd start looking there and follow the money wherever it leads.

Throw that equation into the 24 paragraph EXPH share conundrum and voila'...case SOLVED. Case CLOSED.

SBB

[underdog150]

Oh my, for all the failed DD that was presented here over the last 2 months about the SM, you continue to believe everything that is relayed to you thru your DD sources?
No new CEO announced, no form 3 or 4 information, zero in the way of expected transparency except for the again unaudited financials
that were, to say the least, horrendous.
Has it ever crossed your mind that you are being played by these shareholders to disseminate possible false information for someones trading benefit? Just a thought to ponder.
----------------
i have it on good authority that 2 of the attendees to the
SM (and not locals or insiders) will be doubling their shares
held if pps is taken below X
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=54556768

[Santa Barbara Broker]

we know courtesy of their original filing what was held by both men when the co. came public back in aug 2006

Since you persist...how is it that a private company is purchased by a stock swap reverse merger into a legally reactivated public company shell, shares of that company are then sold to the public on a public exchange (as well as PPs) and that company is not considered a public company until three months after the fact? Just curious.