News Focus
News Focus
icon url

fourkids_9pets

09/18/10 11:32 AM

#82979 RE: venomen2002 #82954

nice post veno as always

as for the shares held and by whom

i've said all along the new ceo would
have a stock comp pkg similar to what
jd and glenn now hold (and since it's
been pr'd as recently as this past wed
that the restricted legend is still on
and neither has sold one share) we know
courtesy of their original filing what
was held by both men when the co. came
public back in aug 2006

we also know (courtesy of same filing)
what KM holds

we know courtesy of so. candle what they
did on the last *known* form D done in
july

and courtesy of a few locals who interact
with folks from the landlord to so. candle
to dropping by unannounced into expo holdings
(one of whom has done so approx 30 times in the
2.5 years he's held exph shares) .. i'm pretty
comfortable with this list .. and like other
longs i do find it telling just how few folks
*hold* the bulk of expo's shares and why it came
as no *surprise* re: the comment made at the SM
about what a handful of folks *HELD* and have HELD

from their info/disclosure statement dated 1/30/07

we have this info shown for those folks holding over 5%
of exph shares .. since co. coming public (aug 2006) AS
was 1B (up thru march 2010) .. 5 percent = 50,000,000 (50M)
shares

125,000,000 = Karl Malone
104,036,000 = Glenn
104,040,000 = JD

interestingly when james kendrick was pr'd as being added
to expo's bod last month .. there was a post presented *here*
that kendrick held more than 10 percent .. that was FLAT OUT
FALSE INFO
.. i actually asked jd about kendrick's involvement
(since as i've said there is one camp who believes he's the
next ceo and another camp who doesn't) and i was told by jd
that yes while kendrick was one of their early and original
investors his *investment* was more like 2% vs. 10 percent
(which of course as *most* understand would have made his
shares show up on the initial info statement of 1/07) .. so

20,000,000 = James Kendrick (i'd suspect he now holds more)

and courtesy of locals who do interact with them .. what the
2 owners of so. candle held b4 the latest info known from
the form D filed (60M/57k) wasn't exactly a secret

100,000,000 = Randy
100,000,000 = Gary

the other rather large sor who interestingly (per jd on the CC
done back in july 2009) also holds the only CD for 10,000$ is
their landlord .. some may remember the *chatter* re: the 2nd
bldg available to expo holdings .. rumor has it it's being
exclusively utilized currently for one *specific* product

regardless the landlord (local) is considered by those i interact
with as being one of the largest sor also (now remember these
stats were known by some b4 this last round of PP was done)

140,000,000 = expo's landlord

---
so with that said .. here's why there is an *imbalance* and why
imo no *effort* will be spared to part longs from their shares

from now thru *full* transparency which started with what was
said at the SM on 9/15 .. continued yesterday ah's with fy 2009
uploaded and will continue thru eoy with ETC/ fy 2010 (q's) and
forms and the name of the new ceo also known

here's the breakdown of shares and i'll use 2007's info for jd/glenn (tho' rounded up 1M)

105M = glenn
105M = jd
125M = new ceo's comp pkg
140M = KM (been told he's added to his original 125M)
140M = expo's landlord
100M = randy/so. candle (not including pp done in 2010)
100M = gary/so. candle (not including pp done in 2010)
45M == new co. hires
20M == james kendrick
100M = employees/friends & family of expo holdings

560M = done via PP at .001 from march - july 2010 (form D)
=====================
1.540.000.000

i still expect the last 100M issued on 7/21/10
(OS = 1.973.987.656) to be shown on a form D
and i believe it went to one of the locals well known
to those who *drop* by unannounced .. so folks can add
that in or keep it out till confirmation comes via forms out

100M = PP on 7/21/10 to a local
=======================
1.640.000.000

now add to this 5 shareholders in the room
with KNOWN totals .. of 7M/17M/37M/60M/104M .. one of whom
publicly disclosed to all present what he held in expo
the other 4 i interact with frequently ~ that total is

225,000,000 shares
=========================
1.865.000.000 shares

and with the inclusion of the sor i call no. 7 who has
sent me info since last dec's SM .. i suspect all
*even* the nitwits at the sec and finra who've been
*dodging* the issue for weeks re: exph's FTD's
(cause hey it's an OTC co.) and WE ALL KNOW
WHAT THAT MEANS where certain entities are involved

200,000,000 shares
=========================
2.065.000.000 minus OS available from TA
1.973.987.656 leaving a *NEGATIVE* of
=========================
91,012,344 exph shares

i want to make it very clear .. the above list includes
NO ONE ELSE .. none of my euro friends who've been kind
enough to send me their tapes/trades .. none of the other
folks i interact with daily/weekly/monthly whose shares
run from 1M+ to 25M+ and why i can say with EXTREME
CONFIDENCE that yeah there is a problem

or as one *delicately* put it

an IMBALANCE of exph shares ... so understand well why the
6M on margin was sought so assiduously and last *monday's*
bear raid HAD TO BE DONE .. those tapes have been sent to
MGMT .. to show exactly when *FIRST* triggered and where
in relation they *show* in regards to each and every PPS
(as i said i was contacted at 4:03 last monday afternoon
because what was bought many ticks lower *were first* sold
at .0024) ..

i've said from the start that this is a war .. there are
entities out there who don't want to cover a massive *imo*
500M+ SHARE SHORT on exph and will do whatever it takes NOT TO

and apparently based on the acc/dist line .. i'm not the only
one who isn't selling and will be *BUYING* more exph shares
if the pps is taken below X

i have it on good authority that 2 of the attendees to the
SM (and not locals or insiders) will be doubling their shares
held if pps is taken below X

so .. i do expect the *DAILY DRAMA* that is EXPH and her
utterly *OBVIOUS* trading PATTERNS .. to continue for the
coming weeks .. but as we all knew with the last go round
when MM ETMM went *POSTAL* at the .0004 (solo on ask)
that the exph longs weren't going to be shaken out and
i'm happy to say .. that the ones i interact with weren't :)

btw for those that have sold and moved on .. i wish all well
and hope that another stock better suits risk/reward


--
4kids
all jmo