shaka, The difference that is apparent to nearly everyone is that IMGGorBust and BennyJ have been "projecting" a potential decision date, not "predicting" a decision date.
Their "projections" are based on the FDA's own statistical data from the first two quarters of 2010. They have, so far, yet to "predict" anything that I have seen.
A "prediction" is usually a wild guess based on nothing in particular except maybe emotions or a hope that the predictor will be lucky enough to appear to have forehand knowledge, if he guesses correctly.
A "projection" is someone taking prior repetative verifiable information and extending it forward to , in effect, say if the verifiable info is true and nothing else has changed in the equation, then there is a reasonable expectation that a similar result will occur again.
Both are truely guesses, but one is based on nothing in particular ("a prediction") and the other is based on prior data that may or may not continue in the future ("a projection.")
So, as I see it, you are either "predicting" that IMGG stock will hit .10 or lower or you are "projecting" that the share price will fall to that level based on your verifiable knowledge of the past performance of IMGG stock.
I see no difference in your "projection" that the share price will sink to .10 or less and IMGGorBust or BennyJ "projecting" that the FDA may come forth with a determination of the SE, NSE or AI within approximately a 150 day time frame.
[Keep in mind that IMGG has 72 hours after notification of FDA decision to announce to the public.]
Ironically, "projected" results are somewhat more "predictable."
GLTY
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
