Does anyone else have a hard time believing the FDA would set itself up for a second count of arbitrary and capricious behavior by approving Teva's ANDA before the lawsuit for SNY is resolved? I personally don't think it would, and that's the main reason I don't buy the Bernstein analyst's assertion that tEnoxaparin will be approved any time soon, aside from the fact that it looks parroted from Teva's statements on the matter. But I'm no lawyer. I don't even play one on television.
IJ has already said elsewhere he has no idea, but I was wondering what the other folks with legal expertise thought about this.
Regards, RockRat