Hello, David
I can't blame you for not wanting to provide information to a group of individuals that engage in harassing behavior. I can empathize with that.
The court proceedings are, indeed, a concern. However, any conclusions drawn from the basis of the company's sales are far from being easily derived.
The battle being always about improving the odds. Recent discussion on this board having been centered on Pensley's credibility. His testimony to the SEC in terms of having authored opinion letters; recanted in the Opposition he filed. And followed with the latest from Mr. Tao, where he now reflects the sentiment first expressed here regarding Mr. Pensley's veracity. Now to await Mr. Tao's realization that as his case against Pensley is strengthened, it also diminishes his charges of the company using forged opinion letters. An improvement of the odds, for the shareholders.
That leaves Olde Monmouth and the evidence they provided. With some shareholders pointing to missing certs, and cancellation failures. Demands for a share count reconciliation gaining support. And therein lies the reason many of us remain hopeful. That such a reconciliation may indicate significantly more shares in the market, than can be attributed to the Company.
Not all of us having "private information" that you, once again, have at your disposal.
In the meanwhile, we will continue to watch what becomes of the allegation that the company used forged opinion letters to sell unregistered shares into the market. We see reason to believe that the opinion letters may not have been forged. And we await a share reconciliation to determine just how many shares are in existence.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
