News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Scandle34

07/22/10 7:07 PM

#59644 RE: jimmenknee #59643

they were dual listed OTCBB and OTCQB. They applied to be dual listed OTCBB and OTCQX. Assuming FINRA doesn't drop them from OTCBB, it's an improvement of status.

Who cares though? Only an improvement of share PRICE matters to yours truly.
icon url

Rawnoc

07/22/10 7:09 PM

#59645 RE: jimmenknee #59643

Wrong again. They are already on the pinks and have been since day 1 as a dual listing. They upgraded their dual listing.

There is no "as opposed to being listed out of a Pink" as they were already quoted on the OTCQB pinksheets in addition to the OTCBB. They got their OTCQB listing upgraded to the OTCQX.

Was it a strategy to improve their pinksheet listing just in case they lose their hearing with the OTCBB? Probably. But that's not the subject of discussion. The subject of discussion is the false dishonest claim that delisting is already a known done fact when in reality it is not. For all we know they already won the hearing. I don't know. Do you?

Yes, the standards for the OTCBB & OTCQX are much higher than the OTCBB & OTCQB which is a good thing. I agree. Hopefully they either win their hearing or already won it and will maintain the dual listing. So far we, or at least I, don't know based on the public information I heard, and I listened to the call several times so I doubt I missed anything at this point. :)
icon url

sdy

07/22/10 7:11 PM

#59648 RE: jimmenknee #59643

I see that as a good thing-- seriously

Yes, JBI now gets a DAD and/or a PAL?
icon url

puppydotcom

07/22/10 7:16 PM

#59652 RE: jimmenknee #59643

losing share holder equity sure didn't help JBIIE .. and that sure was not a good thing