InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

chaarles

07/22/10 1:33 PM

#224901 RE: uzualsuzpect #224898

What I don't understand is how the proposed order for the examiner can be filed by the Debtors when they object so hard to the appointment. It would make more sense to me if it was the UST or the EC. Even if its is an agreed order.
icon url

DudeBug

07/22/10 1:35 PM

#224903 RE: uzualsuzpect #224898

Is Para #2 the basic scope of the Exam .... which only includes the CURRENT POR/DS agreements and how that came about?


Do you see anything that points toward the seizure and the assets that were taken by the FDIC & JPM?


They are trying to pull a fast one with this language!

icon url

warcton

07/22/10 1:37 PM

#224906 RE: uzualsuzpect #224898

3. Consistent the Court's rulings made at the hearing held on July 20, 2010 and the telephonic hearing held on July 22,2010, attached hereto as Exhibit A is a proposed form of order directing the appointment of an examiner(the "Proposed Order").


It looks like this order was agreed to by all parties today via phone conference with the judge.


icon url

STRIKEEAGLE

07/22/10 2:03 PM

#224925 RE: uzualsuzpect #224898

I think we are fine Uz...


THJMW was pi$$ed and it showed all over her face many times the other day.