What I don't understand is how the proposed order for the examiner can be filed by the Debtors when they object so hard to the appointment. It would make more sense to me if it was the UST or the EC. Even if its is an agreed order.
"In 2004, Dimon set a goal for JPMC to acquire the Washington Mutual banking franchise and geographic market by any means necessary. In the months and years that followed, JPMC developed and executed an unlawful scheme designed to achieve this end"