InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

cubinvestor1

07/16/10 12:41 PM

#110816 RE: bharveyalamos #110814

Then why did 7 medical companies offer to partner with them?
Why would Sam risk everything, essentially his life's work, place himself in severe debt, and now be fighting with everything he has, having gone through 3 separate legal teams, to retain control of the Bioharp? Why would 8 world-class scientists work with Sam? Why did they show and demonstrate the Bioharp at two large medical conventions, placing it directly in the hands of 32 MD's, where it received stellar reviews? Why did they discuss in detail animal research? I could go on, but if the premise is everything is a lie, including both Sam and Paul, then what defense can anyone make? Why would so many government health organizations express interest in it? Paul pursued the Bioharp for over 2 years, made several trips to Korea. He had to have vetted it pretty thoroughly, he and Ben (some could even email him about that). I look at how meticulous and detailed and frankly forthright Paul is in a rebuttal, and have to think he is pretty thorough in his overall approach.

I've read about penny stock scams. There's nothing about this that fits the profile (that doesn't stop the flippers). I also have some background in science. I was attracted to the science of the Bioharp. What I think the Bioharp does is read inflammation to an extraordinary degree, pinpointing the readings to body-specific areas, from which it is able to differentiate the quality and degree of those signals, as measures. Inflammation is the future of medicine and diagnosis. That's the reason why the Bioharp has been described as being applicable to so many different areas of diagnosis, so many different medical conditions and diseases, not just cancer, because in medical pathology all roads lead to inflammation, and its particularly true for cancer. For some that may be skeptical, and may fear snake oil, then they would likely be predisposed to dismiss it, perhaps arguing its overpromising. I don't see that. I'm focused on the condition of inflammation, which would make it an invaluable instrument, and I'm saying that as someone that has surveyed medical instruments, and reads medical research regularly.
icon url

tradersamo

07/16/10 12:41 PM

#110817 RE: bharveyalamos #110814

bharveylamos, you always have opinions on everything regarding XMDC, and you are definitely entitled to them, but don't you agree that everyone else is also entitled to their opinions?. Even if you totally disagree with each and every post here, it still does't give you or me the right to try to persuade people that they are wrong!!!, in conclusion what I would love to know is, why do you spend so much of your precious time on XMDC's affairs, if you have no longer any stake here!!!!

I just don't get you???