News Focus
News Focus
icon url

MasterBlastr

07/09/10 10:42 AM

#219323 RE: absinthe69 #219321

Sounds like a fabricated wisecrack . . . maybe the bondholders were crammed down and they no longer have any say in the matter, more likely.
icon url

Chiron

07/09/10 10:43 AM

#219324 RE: absinthe69 #219321

**I don't think this has anything to do with some amount the EC agreed to. It would indicate someone knows equity will get something, obviously more than what we are currently trading at, and it would have leaked. It could have been about another case, it could have been in reference to billing, or something else.

If the EC accepted an offer already, and 'did not hold out for more' and some creditor/noteholder knows the amount - it would have leaked to the MM's and others on The Street. Even if it was $1 - $2 per share, and 50% for preferreds they would all start trading higher imo.

Of course, it could be this person is remaining tight lipped, but if they are openly conversing about it in a public venue I highly doubt it refers to some settlement the EC accepted at that point.
icon url

longhaulq

07/09/10 10:45 AM

#219325 RE: absinthe69 #219321

like someone said- it could be for more BBQ sauce.

..is that Sweeney should have held out for more for his four votes

Elin should have held out for more money, I know 100 million is a lot but ...

..out on centers, but should have held out for more, say ERISA.


IF FOR SOME REASON THIS SETTLES IN 2 WEEKS-

"should have held out for more" was the first inkling, that we are getting paid, but certainly not X2-X3. probably X.5