You want to post links to those challenges? The admins removed them, and issued warnings that such challenges were not allowed. I never expect Cygnus to accept or even remove himself if he lost. I was simply jerking his chain. Seems I jerked more than just his chain, huh?
I will grant you this, however. If the SEC shuts down this company, I'll not only post my losses, but also hang around for as long as it takes for you and others to rub as much salt in my wounds as you want.
Of course, if you expect me to depart now because of some wager from the past that no longer exists, then you apparently don't have much confidence in your SEC "slamming the door" theory, and won't get to enjoy ridiculing my losses and reading my posts about how you were right all along.
By the way, after a month of not posting, I did extend an olive branch to Coastie to negate the challenge he issued where he could resume posting here. My only expectation was that he post links from his DD that turned out to be positive developments for the company, in addition to those that painted the company negatively, which was all he seemed to focus on while ignoring the positive ones that also existed. He declined.
I don't see you crying at all about ALL of his posts from RB getting copied here. If I had removed myself under such conditions, and someone was copying my posts from other boards, I'm sure you'd be complaining to high heaven about it, and questioning my integrity, much like you questioned it about my claim of the shares I held. When I posted proof, you then attacked my average share price. There's no satisfying you. When this company succeeds, you'll still be questioning my investment gains, I'm sure.
It also seems you're a bit hypocritical here. Have you forgotten these posts about how you felt that Coastie shouldn't abide by the conditions of his own challenge?