Replies to post #92773 on Biocentric Energy Holdings, Inc. (BEHL)

[milehighbuck]

[khesanh]

Palm Springs failed relationship still draws anger from the community as they still can not get over loosing BEHL!
Your failed dealings with BEHL are heart wrenching to say the least but you have to learn to get over it and let it go.
So what of the LOI with BEHL? People who are not qualified try to do business everyday with every company in the world. Is BEHL your only failure? I'll bet you have enough of these to wall paper town hall!
A breech of confidentiality shouldn't mean much to you as it appears you have breeched enough of your confidential information with BEHL anyway. The contract is dead anyway so come on, show us.

[seedseller]

gofertrder wrote

If I were to post the LOI signed by BEHL & Wintec that would be a serious breech of confidentiality and subject me to a lawsuit...which I am not willing to engage in at this time.

Yet, you seem to be demanding that BEHL post contracts that are a confidential part of doing business. GET REAL! What company posts details of its contracts. If they did, who would do business with them.

You have no credibility. Grow up. You lost some business with BEHL and Wintec. Sorry. As you keep pointing out here, a deal is not complete until the money is in the bank. Seems like your continuous whining would harm your prospects for making future deals.

[seatrade]

If the contract is not signed by both parties you can show it.

No lawsuit. So prove it.

Go Behl

[tikasun]

Gofertrder ...

If I were to post the LOI signed by BEHL & Wintec ...

Now, the certified paperwork that you displayed on the board re yr shares and the restriction that you told us abt till May 11 has been voluntarily disclosed at yr own discretion and that concerns you alone and no one else.

I am however disturbed abt the mentioning of the italized content of yr post. This is company business that IMO shouldnt even be mentioned on a discussion board. Since it has been mentioned, I am not even feeling safe any more knowing that there is a poster among us who in fact, as asserted, has in his possession the content of an LOI which belongs in the filing cabinets of the companies concerned. As a restricted insider S/H, as it appears, I would expect you to not even touch on these subjects. I shall not be hesitant abt informing DF of the content and manner of the conversations that has been going on on this board in recent weeks. Someone in yr position should be conducting differently and show leadership qualities to all S/Hs involved.
This is not a personal reprimand but rather addresses the safe guarding of the italized case involved.
If anyone on this board disagrees with the content of this post, let them speak.