News Focus
News Focus
icon url

hotdog1012

06/15/10 9:53 PM

#19216 RE: ToBeContinuous #19215

If MM's were counting on a Reverse split accompanied by a cuspid (?) change, then why wouldn't they naked short the stock? They wouldn't have to cover once the RS & cuspid # change went through and they would get away scott-free.

Now however, doesn't this put them in a bind? And if so, isn't the clock ticking on when they will have to account for the shares? And if some strong buying pressure comes in, won't there be a mad scramble to cover?

Seems to me that there is a prime opportunity for some large investors to take advantage of this situation....