News Focus
News Focus
Followers 58
Posts 6972
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/04/2007

Re: ToBeContinuous post# 19215

Tuesday, 06/15/2010 9:53:27 PM

Tuesday, June 15, 2010 9:53:27 PM

Post# of 61078
If MM's were counting on a Reverse split accompanied by a cuspid (?) change, then why wouldn't they naked short the stock? They wouldn't have to cover once the RS & cuspid # change went through and they would get away scott-free.

Now however, doesn't this put them in a bind? And if so, isn't the clock ticking on when they will have to account for the shares? And if some strong buying pressure comes in, won't there be a mad scramble to cover?

Seems to me that there is a prime opportunity for some large investors to take advantage of this situation....

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y